Reorganizing the British National Health Service.
نویسنده
چکیده
I propose to discuss certain developments in health care arrangements which are planned in the United Kingdom. I will discuss these in terms of Scotland which has a separate health service and a separate health department for which the Secretary of State for Scotland with one of his junior Ministers is responsible to Parliament in Westminster. When the National Health Service was established, Scotland had its own National Health Service Act, and in preparation for the reorganization of our Scottish National Health Service in April, 1974, Parliament has just passed another National Health Service Act for Scotland. The specifications and arrangements of the National Health Service in Scotland and in England and Wales are very similar. Similar changes are proposed in our programs of reorganization, although in Scotland we are slightly ahead in terms of our timetable. I will try to present aspects of our experience which may be of interest to you, but let me state at the outset that there are no blueprints for health services. Each country's health services are a product of its culture and political traditions, and there is no place for chauvanism in discussing international differences in health services. At the same time, there are broad similarities between us; our problems have the same common base in developing medical science and technology on the one hand and public expectations on the other. In fact I suspect that the essential problems of health service development facing us today in Western countries are becoming steadily more similar, although the structure and administrative arrangement may be very different. I believe too that we each may see ourselves more clearly in the mirror of a foreign experience. It is with this hope in mind that I will tell you something about our plans in Scotland. We look back now almost a generation to 1948 when our National Health Service was introduced. The National Health Service was brought into existence in a mood of wartime and postwar idealism. It was a central part of a much larger program of change in social services framed to achieve a better society and a more equal and purposeful distribution of resources. The National Health Service took over the preexisting health services and made them available to all as a right of citizenship and without payment. Responsibility was given to Health Ministers and central government departments to promote health, prevent disease, and to provide
منابع مشابه
Exploring 70 Years of the British National Health Service through Anniversary Documents
The British National Health Service (NHS) celebrates its 70th birthday on July 5, 2018. This article examines this anniversary through the lens of previous anniversaries. It examines seven documents close to each anniversary over a period of some 60 years, drawing on interpretive content analysis, based on the narrative dimensions of context (structure and finance); success or achievements; pro...
متن کاملThe Slow, Lingering Death of the English NHS; Comment on “Who Killed the English National Health Service?”
The death of the English National Health Service (NHS) may be slow in coming but that does not mean that it is not the Conservative-led UK government’s desired end state. The government is displaying tactical cunning in achieving its long-term purpose to remould the British state. Powell seeks greater clarity amidst the confusion but the lack of clarity is a principal weapon in the government’s...
متن کاملNational Health Service Principles as Experienced by Vulnerable London Migrants in “Austerity Britain”: A Qualitative Study of Rights, Entitlements, and Civil-Society Advocacy
Background Recent British National Health Service (NHS) reforms, in response to austerity and alleged ‘health tourism,’ could impose additional barriers to healthcare access for non-European Economic Area (EEA) migrants. This study explores policy reform challenges and implications, using excerpts from the perspectives of non-EEA migrants and health advocates in London. Methods A qualitative ...
متن کاملThis Is My (Post) Truth, Tell Me Yours; Comment on “The Rise of Post-truth Populism in Pluralist Liberal Democracies: Challenges for Health Policy”
This is a commentary on the article ‘The rise of post-truth populism in pluralist liberal democracies: challenges for health policy.’ It critically examines two of its key concepts: populism and ‘post truth.’ This commentary argues that there are different types of populism, with unclear links to impacts, and that in some ways, ‘post-truth’ has resonances with arguments advanced in the period a...
متن کاملRhetoric and Reality in the English National Health Service; Comment on “Who Killed the English National Health Service?”
Despite fiscal stress, public confidence in the National Health Service (NHS) remains strong; privatisation has not hollowed out the service. But if long term challenges are to be overcome, pragmatism not rhetoric should be the guide.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine
دوره 46 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1973